15. Theism or Non-theism, which does the evidence (cosmological, teleological and moral law arguments) point to?

In the most general sense, a theist is a person who believes in at
least one god or deity. Theism stands in contrast with atheism
(the denial of the existence of any god) and agnosticism (the
belief that the existence of a God or gods is uncertain). Now,
why is theism true? Simply because the evidence says so.
From the Cosmological Argument we know that God is:
1.Self-existent, timeless, nonspatial, immaterial (since He created
time, space, and matter, he must be outside of time, space, and
matter). In other words, he is without limits. That is, He is
infinite.
2. Unimaginably powerful, since He created the entire universe
out of nothing.
3. Personal, since He chose to convert a state of nothingness
into the time-space-material universe (an impersonal force has
no ability to make choices).
From the Teleological Argument we know that God is:
  1. Supremely intelligent, since He designed life and the universe
    with such incredible complexity and precision.
  1. Purposeful, since He designed the many forms of life to live
    in this specific and ordered environment.
    From the Moral Argument we know that God is:
    Absolutely morally pure (He is the unchangeable standard of
    morality by which all actions are measured. This standard
    includes infinite justice and infinite love).
    Theism is the proper term to describe such a God. Now here is
    the amazing truth about these findings: the theistic God we have
    discovered is consistent with the God of the Bible, but we have
    discovered Him without the use of the Bible. We have shown
    that through good reason, science, and philosophy much can be
    known about the God of the Bible.
    In fact, this is what the Bible itself says (e.g., Psalm 19; Rom.
    1:18-20; 2:14-15). Theologians call this revelation of God natural
    or general revelation (that which is clearly seen independent of
    any type of scripture).
    The revelation of Scripture is called special revelation. So, we
    know through natural revelation that theism is true. This
    discovery helps us to see not only what the true box top looks
    like, but what it cannot look like. Since the opposite of true is
    false, we know that any nontheistic worldview must be false.
    This may seem like a grandiose claim—to deny the truth of so
    many world religions at this stage. But by simple logic—using
    the Law of Noncontradiction—mutually exclusive religions
    cannot all be true. Just as certain football players are rightfully
    cut from the roster of possible players because they lack
    necessary abilities, certain world religions are rightfully cut from
    the roster of possible true religions because they lack necessary
    qualifications.
    So, logically, if theism is true, then all non-theisms are false.
    Now this does not mean that every teaching of a nontheistic
    religion is false or that there is nothing good in those religions—
    there is certainly truth and goodness in most world religions. It
    simply means that as a way of looking at the world (i.e., a
    worldview), any nontheistic religion is built on a false
    foundation. While some details may be true, the core of any
    non-theistic religious system is false. They are systems of error,
    even though they have some truth in them.